Performance of orangefin labeo, Labeo calbasu (Hamilton 1822) as a component of polyculture system

  • Bibha Chetia Borah Fisheries Research Centre, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat -13, Assam, India
  • Rimzhim Gogoi Department of Zoology, Fish and Fishery Science, Gauhati University, Guwahati -781014, Assam, India
  • Abdur Rahman
Keywords: Labeo calbasu, polyculture, monoculture, compatibility, composite carp culture

Abstract

This paper deals with the performance of Labeo calbasu (Hamilton, 1822) as a component of conventional composite carp culture system. The species was included as 50% substitution to common carp (Cyprinus carpio) in view of its omnivorous feeding habit and bottom dwelling nature. The total production was 0.55% higher in the experimental culture (with L. calbasu and Cyprinus carpio) than in the control (common carp only). The difference in the production was however not significant statistically. The comparative economics revealed 5.30% higher return from the experimental unit. Comparison of growth pattern and survival rates of other five species of carps indicated that inclusion of L. calbasu did not have any adverse impact on the other carps. Growth rate of other carps was observed to be higher in the experimental set by 0.05% on an average than the control. Calculated profit per hectare was found to be 9.2% higher in experimental plot than in the control. Although the gross production and return in the experimental unit was not significantly higher than the control, the data supported that L. calbasu is compatible to other component species in composite carp culture system and its inclusion will enhance the economic viability of the system.

References

Anonymous (1997) Package of practices for fish farming in Assam. Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, 104 pp.

APHA (1989) Standard Method for the Examination of Water and waste water. 16 Ed. APHA, AWWA, WPCE, Washington, D.C., 1014 pp.

CAMP (1998). Report of the workshop on “Conservation Assessment and Management plan (CAMP) for Fresh water Fishes of India.” Zoo outreach organization and NBFGR, Lucknow 22-26 September 1997, 156 pp.

Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11: 1-42.

Jhingran VG (1985) Fish and Fisheries of India. Fish culture in Fresh water Ponds. Hindustan Publ. corp., India, 666 pp.

Faroogh K and Siddiqui MS (1989) Food and feeding habits of the carp Labeo calbasu Ham in North Indian waters. Acta Ichthyologica Et Piscatoria XIX(1): 33-48.

Lakra WS and Singh AK (2007) Exotic fish introduction in Indian waters: Past experience and lessons for the future. Fishing Chimes 27(1): 30-34.

Rahman MM, Jo Q, Gong YG, Miller SA and Hossain MY (2008) A comparative study of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) and calbasu (Labeo calbasu Hamilton) on bottom soil resuspension, water quality, nutrient accumulations, food intake and growth of fish in simulated rohu (Labeo rohita Hamilton) ponds. Aquaculture 285 (1-4): 78-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.08.002

Sahu PK, Jena JK and Das PC (2007) Nursery rearing of kalbasu, Labeo calbasu (Hamilton), at different stocking densities in outdoor concrete tanks. Aquaculture Research 38(2): 188-192. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2006.01648.x

Sahu PK, Jena JK, Das PC, Mondal S and Das R (2006) Production performance of Labeo calbasu (Hamilton) in polyculture with three Indian major carps Catla catla (Hamilton), Labeo rohita (Hamilton) and Cirrhinus mrigala (Hamilton) with provision of fertilizers, feed and periphytic substrate as varied inputs. Aquaculture 262(2-4): 333-339. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.11.016

Sinha VRP, Chakraborty RD, Tripathi SD, Das P and Sinha M (1985) Carp culture. Package of practices for increasing production. Aquaculture Extension Manual New Series, No. 2, CIFRI, Barrackpore, 28 pp.

Swingle HS (1967) Standardization of chemical analysis for waters and pond muds. FAO Fish. Rep. 44: 397−421.

Published
2014-04-30
How to Cite
Borah, B. C., Gogoi, R., & Rahman, A. (2014). Performance of orangefin labeo, Labeo calbasu (Hamilton 1822) as a component of polyculture system. Journal of Fisheries, 2(1), 86-89. https://doi.org/10.17017/j.fish.65